1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Sprite | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2490 mm |
