1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2003 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 796 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2003 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Jeep |
| Model | Sprite | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 72 L |
