1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Proton 400 weights approximately 256 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Proton |
Model | Sprite | 400 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |