1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2003 Renault Grand Espace
To start off, 2003 Renault Grand Espace is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,187 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Grand Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Grand Espace weights approximately 1186 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Grand Espace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2003 Renault Grand Espace | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Renault |
Model | Sprite | Grand Espace |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2187 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 83 L |