1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2004 Caterham 7
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 244 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2004 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Caterham |
Model | Sprite | 7 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2230 mm |