1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1685 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2004 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Sprite | Armada |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 2399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 106 L |