1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Montana is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 1271 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2005 Pontiac Montana | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Pontiac |
Model | Sprite | Montana |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 95 L |