1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 471 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | Sprite | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 236 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |
