1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2009 BMW M3
To start off, 2009 BMW M3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2009 BMW M3 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | BMW |
Model | Sprite | M3 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 63 L |