1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 391 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sprite | Tahoe |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 332 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 98 L |
