1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2010 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Express is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1688 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2010 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sprite | Express |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 2402 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5692 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 2073 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3429 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 117 L |
