1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 886 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sprite | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2384 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2760 mm |
