1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 499 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
Model | Sprite | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1213 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 40 L |