1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 1215 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Dodge |
| Model | Sprite | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 365 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1929 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5077 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3052 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 72 L |
