1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1935 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Sprite | Phantom |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 2649 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 5842 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1638 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 100 L |