1965 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1204 kg more than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Austin-Healey Sprite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Volvo |
Model | Sprite | XC60 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 714 kg | 1918 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2774 mm |