1965 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1136 kg more than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Autobianchi Primula | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mazda |
| Model | Primula | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1220 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 76 L |
