1965 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 266 kg more than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Autobianchi Primula | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Autobianchi | Kia |
Model | Primula | RIO |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1096 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 43 L |