1965 Autobianchi Primula vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Autobianchi Primula. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Autobianchi Primula would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. (57 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 455 kg more than 1965 Autobianchi Primula. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Autobianchi Primula | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Toyota |
| Model | Primula | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1220 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 50 L |
