1965 Autobianchi Stellina vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1969 ZAZ 966 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Autobianchi Stellina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Autobianchi Stellina would be higher. At 887 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 27 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 ZAZ 966 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1965 Autobianchi Stellina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Autobianchi Stellina (55 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1965 Autobianchi Stellina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Autobianchi Stellina | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Autobianchi | ZAZ |
Model | Stellina | 966 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 767 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 27 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 55 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2170 mm |