1965 Autobianchi Stellina vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Autobianchi Stellina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Autobianchi Stellina would be higher. At 767 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Autobianchi Stellina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Autobianchi Stellina.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Autobianchi Stellina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Autobianchi Stellina | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Stellina | Minica |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 767 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2350 mm |
