1965 Autobianchi Stellina vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Autobianchi Stellina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Autobianchi Stellina would be higher. At 767 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Autobianchi Stellina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Autobianchi Stellina.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Autobianchi Stellina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1965 Autobianchi Stellina has manual transmission. 1965 Autobianchi Stellina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Autobianchi Stellina | 2001 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Stellina | Minica |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
| Engine Size | 767 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1440 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2350 mm |
