1965 Bristol 408 vs. 1947 Simca 5
To start off, 1965 Bristol 408 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Simca 5 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 408 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1947 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 1947 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Bristol 408 weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1947 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 408 | 1947 Simca 5 | |
Make | Bristol | Simca |
Model | 408 | 5 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1947 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5130 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2010 mm |