1965 Bristol 408 vs. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 408 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1965 Bristol 408. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1965 Bristol 408.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Bristol 408 | 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | 408 | El Camino |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 350 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2980 mm |
