1965 Bristol 408 vs. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,130 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 408 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Bristol 408 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Bristol 408 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Bristol 408. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 408 | 1983 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 408 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5130 cc | 2843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2580 mm |