1965 Bristol 408 vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,881 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (325 HP @ 2900 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1965 Bristol 408. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1965 Bristol 408.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Bristol 408. (464 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Bristol 408.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Bristol 408 | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Bristol | Dodge |
| Model | 408 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5130 cc | 5881 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Torque | 464 Nm | 827 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 4080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 129 L |
