1965 Bristol 408 vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1965 Bristol 408. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1965 Bristol 408.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Bristol 408. (464 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Bristol 408.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Bristol 408 | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 408 | F-350 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5130 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 464 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 132 L |
