1965 Bristol 409 vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1965 Bristol 409 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Bristol 409 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1955 Ford Crestline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 409 | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 409 | Crestline |
Year Released | 1965 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 4453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2940 mm |