1965 Bristol 409 vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 1965 Bristol 409 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 409 (215 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 409 (463 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1965 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Bristol 409 | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Bristol | Holden |
| Model | 409 | EK |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
