1965 Bristol 409 vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1965 Bristol 409 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Bristol 409 weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 431 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1965 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 409 | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Bristol | Suzuki |
Model | 409 | Fronte |
Year Released | 1965 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2060 mm |