1965 Bristol 409 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Bristol 409 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 409 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 409 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1965 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 57 L |