1965 Bristol 409 vs. 1982 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 350 kg more than 1965 Bristol 409.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 409 | 1982 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 409 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 5031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3090 mm |