1965 Bristol 409 vs. 1997 Renault Helem

To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 295 more horse power than 1965 Bristol 409. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1965 Bristol 409. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 50 kg more than 1965 Bristol 409. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 409 (463 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1965 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem. 1965 Bristol 409 has automatic transmission and 1997 Renault Helem has manual transmission. 1997 Renault Helem will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Bristol 409 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: