1965 Bristol 409 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 120 kg more than 1965 Bristol 409.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Bristol 409. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 409 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 409 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3010 mm |