1965 Bristol 409 vs. 2007 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2007 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 409 (215 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1965 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1965 Bristol 409 has automatic transmission and 2007 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2007 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Bristol 409 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 409 | 2007 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 409 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1965 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2490 mm |