1965 Bristol 409 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 409 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Volvo S40. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo S40.
Because 1965 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 409 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1965 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 409 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Bristol | Volvo |
Model | 409 | S40 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |