1965 Bristol 409 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze

To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 409 (215 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.

Because 1965 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 409 (463 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1965 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze. 1965 Bristol 409 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Bristol 409 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: