1965 Bristol 409 vs. 2012 Honda Accord
To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Bristol 409. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Bristol 409 would be higher. At 5,211 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Bristol 409 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Bristol 409 (215 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2012 Honda Accord. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Bristol 409 should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Accord.
Because 1965 Bristol 409 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Bristol 409. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Bristol 409 (463 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Accord. (350 Nm). This means 1965 Bristol 409 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Bristol 409 | 2012 Honda Accord | |
Make | Bristol | Honda |
Model | 409 | Accord |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5211 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 463 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |