1965 Buick Electra vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Buick Electra weights approximately 843 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Buick Electra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Buick Electra | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
| Model | Electra | Astro |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6570 cc | 4300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1187 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 64 L |
