1965 Buick Electra vs. 2002 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1965 Buick Electra. (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1965 Buick Electra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 648 kg more than 1965 Buick Electra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Buick Electra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Buick Electra | 2002 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | Electra | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6570 cc | 5966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 340 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 64 L |
