1965 Buick Electra vs. 2005 Honda Fit
To start off, 2005 Honda Fit is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2005 Honda Fit. (82 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2005 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Buick Electra weights approximately 970 kg more than 2005 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Buick Electra | 2005 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Buick | Honda |
| Model | Electra | Fit |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6570 cc | 1339 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 58 L |
