1965 Buick Electra vs. 2006 Citroen C2
To start off, 2006 Citroen C2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Buick Electra (275 HP) has 208 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Buick Electra weights approximately 1035 kg more than 2006 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Buick Electra | 2006 Citroen C2 | |
| Make | Buick | Citroen |
| Model | Electra | C2 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6570 cc | 1398 cc |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 67 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 41 L |
