1965 Buick Electra vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (151 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Buick Electra weights approximately 480 kg more than 2009 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1965 Buick Electra has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 5 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Buick Electra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Buick Electra | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Electra | 5 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6570 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1760 mm |