1965 Buick Electra vs. 2012 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1965 Buick Electra. (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1965 Buick Electra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 543 kg more than 1965 Buick Electra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Buick Electra | 2012 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | Electra | Suburban |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6570 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2573 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5649 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1951 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 117 L |