1965 Buick Electra vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (301 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1965 Buick Electra. (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 1965 Buick Electra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Buick Electra weights approximately 8 kg more than 2013 Ford EDGE.
Because 2013 Ford EDGE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Buick Electra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Buick Electra | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Electra | EDGE |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6570 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2022 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4679 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2223 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 72 L |
