1965 Buick Electra vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Taurus (284 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1965 Buick Electra. (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1965 Buick Electra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Buick Electra weights approximately 196 kg more than 2013 Ford Taurus.
Because 1965 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Buick Electra | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Electra | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6570 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1834 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5154 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2177 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2868 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |
