1965 Buick Electra vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,570 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-09. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-09 weights approximately 32 kg more than 1965 Buick Electra.
Because 2013 Mazda CX-09 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Buick Electra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Buick Electra | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Electra | CX-09 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6570 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 76 L |