1965 Buick Riviera vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Buick Riviera would be higher. At 6,966 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Buick Riviera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Buick Riviera (288 HP) has 154 more horse power than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (134 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Buick Riviera should accelerate faster than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Buick Riviera (603 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm). This means 1965 Buick Riviera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1965 Buick Riviera | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | Riviera | Camaro |
Year Released | 1965 | 1989 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6966 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 134 HP |
Torque | 603 Nm | 223 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104.8 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 76.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2580 mm |