1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 660 kg more than 1980 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Calais | 260 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |
