1965 Cadillac Calais vs. 1983 Fiat Uno
To start off, 1983 Fiat Uno is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Uno. (71 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Uno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1204 kg more than 1983 Fiat Uno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 Cadillac Calais | 1983 Fiat Uno | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | Calais | Uno |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2010 kg | 806 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 38 L |
